Innovating on campus well-being, social value and greenspace of Edge Hill University
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pointon-Haas et al. (2024) highlight that Universities’ student services are seeking ways to address increasing demand regarding mental health and well-being. Malagodi et al. (2024) state that over a quarter of UK students report a mental health issue and reactive support services cannot cope with demand, however there are opportunities to innovate on such service with gaps in current provision. Broglia and Barkham’s (2024) findings about campus well-being and greenspace shows a positive correlation between both, however, they state that university campuses’ natural environments and greenspace are underutilised across programmes and sites for student’ restorative therapies and relief. Bai et al. (2024) explore impacts of greenspace on mental well-being of University students showing that greenery significantly mitigates the level of mental health issues. Thompson et al. (2023) found that students surveyed in green spaces reported significantly more positive sense of belonging compared to those in non-green campus spaces. Ribeiro et al. (2024) promote dynamic service ecosystems in enhancing health and well-being outcomes and student experiences. Innovation on greenspace offer opportunities to meet SDGs, in particular SDG3 (Catahan, Hopwood and Suraweera, 2024). Many University students suffer with mental health and well-being challenges, and it is a significant public and social health concern (Elsden et al., 2023). This Transformative Service Research (Anderson, et al., 2013; Anderson and Xue, 2022; Russell-Bennett et al., 2024) considers opportunities for Edge Hill University to further develop as a potential exemplar model for others regarding campus well-being, value-cocreation, and green social prescribing innovation (Howarth et al., 2020).This poster presentation was first authored and delivered at the EHU RIMES 2024 event. The poster is a PNG file. An accessible text-only version of the poster is also provided in Word. Hopwood, M. and Catahan, N. (2024) Innovating on campus well-being, social value and greenspace of Edge Hill University. [Poster]. RIMES Celebration Event 2024, 4 December, Edge Hill University, Creative Edge, UK.This was part of a broader umbrella study entitled "Transformative Service and Sustainability" led by Nicholas Catahan.Initial guiding/supporting referencesAnderson, L., Ostrom, A.L., Corus, C., Fisk, R.P., Gallan, A.S., Giraldo, M., Mende, M., Mulder, M., Rayburn, S.W., Rosenbaum, M.S. and Shira hada, K., 2013. Transformative service research: An agenda for the future. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), pp.1203-1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.013Anderson, L. and Xue, Y., 2022. Transformative service research: where we are and moving forward at the collective level. The Palgrave Handbook of Service Management, pp.437-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91828-6_23Bai, Y., Wang, R., Yang, L., Ling, Y. and Cao, M., 2024. The Impacts of Visible Green Spaces on the Mental well-being of University Students. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, pp.1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-024-09578-7Broglia, E. and Barkham, M., 2024. Adopting the principles and practices of learning health systems in universities and colleges: recommendations for delivering actionable data to improve student mental health. Cogent Mental Health, 3(1), pp.1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/28324765.2023.2301339Catahan, N., Hopwood, M. and Suraweera, P., 2024. Botanic Garden Tourism, Social Value, Health, and Well-Being. Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens, 5(2), pp.187-199. https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg5020013Elsden, E., Kador, T., Sercombe, H., Piper, K., Barkan, M., Webster, E. and Smyth Zahra, F., 2023. Experiential learning spaces and student well- being: a mixed-methods study of students at three research intensive UK universities. International Review of Psychiatry, pp.1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2023.2268720Howarth, M., Brettle, A., Hardman, M. and Maden, M. 2020. What Is the Evidence for the Impact of Gardens and Gardening on Health and Well- Being: A Scoping Review and Evidence-Based Logic Model to Guide Healthcare Strategy Decision Making on the Use of Gardening Approaches As a Social Prescription. BMJ open, 10(7), 1-16. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/7/e036923Malagodi, F., Dommett, E.J., Findon, J.L. and Gardner, B., 2024. Physical activity interventions to improve mental health and wellbeing in university students in the UK: A service mapping study. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 26, p.100563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2023.100563Ribeiro, H., Santana, K.V.D.S. and Oliver, S.L., 2024. Natural Environments in University Campuses and Students’ Well-Being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(4), p.413. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21040413Russell-Bennett, R., Rosenbaum, M.S., Fisk, R.P. and Raciti, M.M., 2024. SDG editorial: improving life on planet earth–a call to action for service research to achieve the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Journal of Services Marketing, 38(2), pp.145-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-11-2023-0425Pointon-Haas, J., Waqar, L., Upsher, R., Foster, J., Byrom, N. and Oates, J., 2024. A systematic review of peer support interventions for student mental health and well-being in higher education. BJPsych Open, 10(1), p.e12. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.603Thompson, C.A., Pownall, M., Harris, R. and Blundell-Birtill, P., 2023. Is the grass always greener? Access to campus green spaces can boost students’ sense of belonging. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(8), pp.1841-1857. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-11-2022-0349
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it