MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115677198 · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2025.12.006

On the reusability of machine learning-based process monitoring systems for manufacturing digital twins

2025· article· en· W7115677198 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Manufacturing Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsReusabilityReuseDomain (mathematical analysis)Process (computing)OverfittingComputer-aided process planningQuality (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advanced manufacturing is increasingly supported by machine learning (ML)-based digital twins (DTs) for real-time process monitoring and quality assurance. However, changes in physical domain configurations (e.g., machines, materials, and sensors) often cause domain shifts, limiting the reusability of existing DT components. Rebuilding DTs from scratch for each new configuration is costly and time-consuming. To address this challenge, we define DT reusability through three key criteria: FAIRness (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability), transferability, and transfer efficiency. We propose a framework to systematically support the reuse of ML-based process modeling components in DTs, consisting of three phases: FAIR compliance, transferability analysis, and domain adaptation. To enhance transfer efficiency, we introduce the domain-adversarial and decision distribution alignment (DADDA) network, which enables class-conditional alignment and mitigates overfitting through competing domain alignment objectives. A case study on vision-based process monitoring in additive manufacturing was conducted to validate the proposed framework. A FAIR-compliant database of existing DT components was developed, and the most suitable source domain for the designated target domain was identified through an evaluation of semantic and statistical similarity. Leveraging the selected source dataset, DADDA achieved 84 % accuracy after unsupervised pre-training and 96.9 % after supervised fine-tuning with only 210 labeled examples. Further validation on acoustic-based monitoring systems demonstrated the applicability of DADDA to various modalities. • Changes in physical domain configurations of a digital twin degrade process modeling performance. • Reusability is crucial for maintaining the effectiveness of digital twins over such changes. • Systematic reuse is achieved by ensuring FAIRness, transferability, and transfer efficiency. • Proposed unsupervised domain adaptation improves transfer efficiency while mitigating overfitting. • Validation on laser additive manufacturing shows high accuracy with minimal labeled data required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it