Bibliographic record
Abstract
From a fish perspective, architecture is a passage point in its transformation from animal to commodity. Indus- trial fisheries fish for profit, and they require buildings to support their economic activity. Hence, architecture becomes entangled within the intricate relationship em- bodied in the continuum between terrestrial and marine landscapes. Understanding this broad network, where natural and anthropic factors come together, requires multidisciplinary research, from architecture to marine biology. Within this framework, this paper presents the results of a case study addressing a key question: What is the relationship between architectures built for fishing and the ecological balance of fish populations? The object of study is cod and the ecosystems of the Grand Banks off Newfoundland. These cod populations have been exploited from the fifteenth century until their ultimate collapse, when in 1992 Canada government issued a moratorium preventing commercial cod fish- eries in its territorial waters. A minor part of this popu- lation was exploited by Portuguese fisheries, amongst which is the Parceria Geral de Pescarias (PGP), located in Barreiro, south of Lisbon, and operating from the late-nineteenth century to the mid-twentieth century. The PGP site went through several transformations during its lifetime, including new open-air racks and indoor artificial dryers to process the cod. Fished thou- sands of kilometres away, its production mainly fed the population of Lisbon. To rethink policies of planetary management, archi- tectural history must assess the interplay between de- sign and nature. Thus, another question: How can we render visible the dimensions and characteristics of built structures and relate them to their impact on the unstable ecological dynamics of fish species within marine ecosystems?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.310 | 0.089 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".