MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115893010 · doi:10.5604/01.3001.0055.5180

Sorry, That’s the Climate We’re in. On the Sense of Absence of a Self-ConsciousAnthropocene in Literature

2025· article· W7115893010 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTekstualia · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnthropoceneClimate changeFace (sociological concept)Reflection (computer programming)Quarter (Canadian coin)PublishingGlobal warmingPerspective (graphical)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<ns3:p>This article explores the presence of the „self-conscious Anthropocene” (Lynn Keller) in Polish literaturein the first quarter of the 21st century. Although the Polish publishing market is repletewith publications that explicitly address human-caused climate change and a potential climatecrisis, they are confined to specific segments: children’s literature and non-fiction. Climate fictionconstitutes a separate fi eld, but as it stems from science fiction, it contextualizes considerationsof the course, effects, and possibilities of preventing climate catastrophe differently. The ignoringof the anthropocene by contemporary Polish literature seems to reflect the impotence of literatureand the accompanying critical and academic reflection in the face of the most pressing problemfacing the contemporary world.</ns3:p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it