MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116917707 · doi:10.1108/ajim-04-2025-0241

LLM-based stemming for improved Gujarati information retrieval

2025· article· en· W7116917707 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAslib Journal of Information Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGujaratiRelevance (law)PreprocessorRanking (information retrieval)Precision and recallRecallLanguage modelFocus (optics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Stemming is a critical preprocessing phase in information retrieval (IR) and natural language processing (NLP) tasks, aimed at reducing words to their root forms to improve query matching and retrieval performance. While effective stemming algorithms exist for high-resource languages, low-resource languages such as Gujarati lack a robust solution. Existing rule-based, dictionary-based and hybrid stemming techniques for the Gujarati language struggle to handle morphological variations, contextual understanding and out-of-vocabulary words, which limits their effectiveness in search engines and text-processing applications. Design/methodology/approach This research study proposes two distinct stemming techniques for Gujarati: (1) an IndoWordNet-based method and (2) a novel large language model (LLM)-based approach comprising three variants: word-level (LLM-WL), sentence-level (LLM-SL) and part of speech-sentence-level (LLM-POS-SL). For LLM implementation, we used the GPT-4-0613 model. These methods were evaluated on a curated Gujarati corpus of 20,849 words using standard metrics: precision, recall and F-score. The impact of stemming on IR performance was assessed using Gujarati Wikipedia search queries, with evaluation metrics including mean average precision (MAP) and Precision@10. Findings The LLM-POS-SL variant achieved the best results, with an average precision of 96.7%, a recall of 91.95% and an F-score of 94.26%. IR experiments further confirmed that LLM-POS-SL enhances search relevance and ranking with superior MAP and Precision@10. Practical implications These findings underscore the potential of LLM-based stemming in enhancing Gujarati NLP tools, improving the effectiveness of digital search systems. This research advances socio-technical development in regional-language IR and promotes more equitable access to information. Future work will focus on optimizing efficiency, scalability and domain-specific adaptations to further improve stemming accuracy. Originality/value To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported study to leverage an LLM for the stemming task in Gujarati or any other Indian language.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.011
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it