MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116944157 · doi:10.1007/s11207-025-02587-w

A Novel Polarimetric Approach for Sun Center Determination and In-Flight Calibration Using Metis Coronagraph on Solar Orbiter

2025· article· en· W7116944157 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSolar Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Space AgencyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyJet Propulsion LaboratoryIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsCoronagraphOrbiterPolarimetrySolar observatoryCorona (planetary geology)Solar radiusBrightnessPolarization (electrochemistry)Photosphere

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In both coronagraphic and total solar eclipse observations, the solar disk is not directly visible. Blocking direct light from the photosphere is essential to observe the visible solar corona, which is $10^{-5}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> to $10^{-11}$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>11</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> of the disk intensity. This lack of direct observation of the solar disk introduces uncertainty in determining the Sun center behind the occulter, especially in cases where instrument limitations or low signal-to-noise ratios make it challenging to apply standard astrometric approaches. We present a novel method for locating the Sun center behind the occulter during coronagraphic observations, developed using the Metis polarimetric measurements during the first close Solar Orbiter perihelion. We further suggest how this technique can enable in-flight polarization calibration. We carried out polarimetric observations of the solar corona using data from the Metis visible-light (VL) channel (580 – 640 nm). The linearly polarized brightness of the Thomson scattered corona is expected to be mainly tangential to the solar limb. By identifying pairs of such tangential polarization vectors at approximately $180^{\circ }$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>180</mml:mn> <mml:mo>∘</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:math> apart, the Sun center can be geometrically determined as the intersection point of the lines passing by these vectors. Alternatively, if the position of the Sun center is already known, the results can be further refined and potentially used to calibrate the elements of the demodulation matrix employed to derive the Stokes parameters. This article presents a novel method for detecting the Sun center behind an occulter. The approach was successfully tested, considering different distances from the Sun and off-pointing maneuvers. The discrepancy between the actual Sun center and the one estimated using this method is typically within a few pixels on the Metis VL detector, when we use coronal data with high signal-to-noise ratio. These results suggest that the method provides a valuable alternative to traditional astrometric techniques and could enable new in-flight calibration strategies for polarimetric instrumentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.814

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it