Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article focuses on Winston Churchill's relations with three Australian prime ministers, Robert Menzies, Arthur Fadden and John Curtin, between 1940 and 1942. In doing so, the article reflects on the historiographical debate about Churchill and Australia during the Second World War and what Australia's dominion status meant at the time. In the interwar period, Australia generally resisted the efforts of Canada, South Africa and the Irish Free State to move quickly in the direction of greater autonomy. It is the argument of this article that Australia's outlook on its dominion status changed dramatically during the Second World War. Fear of invasion by Japan impelled its leaders to demand that it be treated as an equal with the right to a greater say in allied strategy and the disposition of its military forces. This outlook frequently placed the three Australian leaders at odds with Churchill, whom they resented as treating Australia like a colony. At the same time, Churchill's attitudes to Australia were paradoxical. Despite his firm views on imperial strategy and the proper role of Australia in supporting it, Churchill and his wartime government ultimately deferred to Australia's strongly expressed wishes and treated Australia as an independent country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".