MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116963430 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2025.3647278

Reliability Assessment of Distribution Systems With Microgrids Using Discrete-Time Markov Chains

2025· article· W7116963430 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersEaton Corporation
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)Markov chainMicrogridMarkov processLoad SheddingMonte Carlo methodEnergy (signal processing)Markov modelDistributed generation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microgrids can improve the reliability and resiliency of modern distribution systems. The stochasticity of local non-dispatchable distributed energy resources (NDDERs), combined with the time-dependency of battery energy storage systems (BESSs) and load shedding strategies (LSSs), complicates the reliability assessment of distribution networks embedded with microgrids. In this work, we propose a minimal cut-set method using a discrete-time Markov chain to perform the time-series adequacy assessment. Our method offers an alternative to sequential Monte Carlo simulations (SMCSs) to account for the stochasticity of NDDERs and the time-dependency of BESSs and LSSs. Case studies on modified IEEE-RTBS Bus2 and IEEE 123-Test Feeder systems assess the accuracy of the method when compared with SMCSs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it