MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7116980251 · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2025.103496

The stochastic production routing problem with adaptive routing and service level constraints

2025· article· en· W7116980251 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOmega · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHealthcare Excellence Canada
KeywordsRouting (electronic design automation)Production (economics)Service (business)Service levelMultipath routing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Demand uncertainty poses a challenge to most companies in manufacturing and services as it can lead to significant profit losses if not addressed properly. To deal with this risk, companies may adopt specific service level targets to satisfy at least a certain proportion of their demand while considering operational constraints and minimizing the total cost. In this study we address the stochastic production routing problem (PRP) with adaptive routing and service level constraints. The PRP unifies the production, inventory and routing decisions into an integrated problem aimed at improving coordination across different parts of the system. We consider four different types of service levels, where each type uses a specific metric based on assumptions aligning with the needs of the company. These metrics encompass aspects such as the occurrence of stockouts or allowed ratios of backlogs or backorders to average demand. A two-stage stochastic formulation is proposed for each type of service level. Setup decisions are made in the first stage, and production, inventory, and routing decisions are adapted after demand realization. Considering routing decisions in the second stage increases flexibility while lowering overall costs. However, the resulting optimization problem is more challenging to solve than the case where routing decisions are made in the first stage. To address this issue, we introduce an iterative matheuristic algorithm designed to yield high-quality solutions within a reasonable computation time. The effectiveness of the proposed heuristic algorithm is demonstrated through extensive experiments, highlighting its potential to assist companies in managing demand uncertainty and enhancing operational efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it