Recent progress on mid-infrared single-photon detectors and sources for satellite-based quantum key distribution—a review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Satellite quantum key distribution technology has developed rapidly using near-infrared wavelengths and is expected to enable global quantum communication. However, link availability is still hampered by detrimental effects in the free-space channel, such as background noise from solar radiation and attenuation from turbulence and weather such as haze and fog. One potential mitigation technique is to move to the mid-infrared atmospheric transmission window (3–5 µ ms) where background noise and turbulence effects are significantly reduced. While mid-infrared quantum technology is not as well developed, advancements in mid-infrared entangled photon pair generation and nonlinear upconversion single-photon detectors could be poised to enable daytime satellite downlinks with increased reliability. This review compares the state of the art for quantum transmitters and receivers in the mid-infrared to the more established near-infrared technology. The goal is to identify gaps in transmitter and/or receiver technology in the mid-infrared, and to determine if the mid-infrared can offer significant advantages over the near infrared for quantum communication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".