MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117235889 · doi:10.62051/5r67q073

Doppler-Based Sound Localization and Its Application in AI-empowered Traffic Warning for Deafness

2025· article· W7117235889 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsCanadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrophoneDoppler effectSIGNAL (programming language)Sound localizationWearable computerSound (geography)Acoustic source localizationSignal processingMicrophone array

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hearing is essential for information processing and our safety, especially in traffic. For patients with hearing impairments, sound localization devices help identify threatening sound sources and reduce traffic safety risk. Existing methods typically rely on measuring time delay using microphone arrays. Unfortunately, this method faces critical challenges for dynamic sound sources, posing major threats. Addressing this challenge, we propose a wearable sound localization system that combines interaural time differences and Doppler frequency shifts to determine the position, direction, and speed of moving sound sources. The method's feasibility is first evaluated through a combination of theoretical calculations and experimental verifications. A proof-of-concept setup was established by engaging three microphones as the receiver and a toy car emitting a constant tone as the sound source. An AI algorithm based on artificial neural network was further trained using the received sound signal when the source moved at different locations and directions. The results demonstrated accurate detection of Doppler shifts, with classification accuracies of 100% for front/back, 87.5% for distance, and 62.5% for left/right. Finally, the system was integrated into a wristband with feedback motors, providing vibrational alerts based on the detected motion and proximity of sound sources. These results validate the feasibility of using Doppler shifts and machine learning for motion detection in real time. The proposed system offers a portable solution to enhance the awareness of the environment for individuals with hearing impairments and lays the groundwork for future warning devices in traffic safety applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it