MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117253002 · doi:10.1007/s44327-025-00172-1

Investigation of pluvial flash flood loads on overpasses for the city of Montreal

2025· article· en· W7117253002 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscover Cities · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTrottier Institute for Sustainability in Engineering and DesignAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsFlash floodPluvialFlood mythFlash (photography)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Warmer temperatures in a future climate can lead to more frequent high intensity short-duration rainfall events, which can lead to frequent and severe flash floods. Such events pose significant threats to urban infrastructure, including urban overpasses, which have not been adequately explored. This study combines high-resolution (4 km) regional climate simulations from the Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) model with two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling, based on HEC-RAS, at 25 m spatial resolution to assess vulnerability of overpasses in Montreal, the second-largest city in Canada, under flood-induced hydrostatic, drag, and debris impact loads for different greenhouse gas emission scenarios. HEC-RAS simulations for design storms, developed following the Huff curve and Chicago methods, corresponding to 100-year return levels of 15-min, 1-h, and 6-h rainfall events for current and future climates obtained from GEM, suggest future increases in inundated areas by 13 to 31%, with higher changes being associated with shorter-duration events. Moreover, classification of overpasses into various risk categories (i.e., low, medium, and high) based on flood loads indicates potential increases in the number of overpasses in both high- and medium-risk categories in future climate. Risk categorization shows that 6-h duration events in current climate have the highest number of overpasses (30) in the high-risk category, with far future projections indicating increases of 17-200% in the number of high-risk overpasses across all storm durations. This foundational work will form the basis for detailed investigations focused on individual overpasses and infrastructure design considerations that account for the intensification of flash flood loads under future climate conditions to ensure climate resiliency. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44327-025-00172-1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it