Regioselective synthesis of novel spiro-isoxazolines congeners as antimicrobial agents: in vitro and in-silico assessments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction A new class of spiroisoxazolines was efficiently synthesized through a regioselective cycloaddition between arylidene tetralone 1 and arylnitrile oxides 2 , characterized and assessed for their in vitro antimicrobial activity. Methods The structures and regioselectivity of the obtained cycloadducts were confirmed by 1H, 13C-NMR, IR, elemental analysis, and mass spectrometry, and further supported by theoretical calculations that explained the reaction process and the regioselective results. The antimicrobial profile of the synthetized spiro derivatives was evaluated against the yeast Candida albicans, the Gram-postive bacteria ( Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis ), and the Gram-negative bacteria ( Escherichia coli and Pectobacterium basiliensis ). In addition, in silico studies were carried out to rationalize the experimental findings and provide mechanistic insight. Results and Discussion Two spiroisoxazolines, defined as 3b and c , showed notable antimicrobial activity, producing inhibition zones between 8.33 ± 0.57 and 14.00 ± 2.00 mm. Compound 3b was active against all tested strains and demonstrated ampicillin-comparable MIC values of 10 μg/mL against E. coli , P. brasiliensis , and B. subtilis . It showed moderate to weak activity against S. aureus (90 μg/mL) and C. albicans (300 μg/mL). Compound 3c displayed selective activity toward Gram-positive bacteria with MIC values of 50 and 500 μg/mL against B. subtilis and S. aureus , respectively. Molecular docking studies confirmed the high binding affinities of 3b and 3c toward the active sites of the targeted proteins, in agreement with the antimicrobial results. POM analyses further indicated the coexistence of antifungal (O1δ−—O2δ−) and antiviral (O1δ−—N1δ−) pharmacophoric sites, although steric constraints introduced by two methyl substituents may limit their optimal interaction. The calculations also confirmed favorable bioavailability and the absence of predicted toxicity for all compounds. Overall, this combined experimental -theoretical study highlights the mechanistic basis and biological relevance of these spiroisoxazolines, underscoring their potential as promising scaffolds for the rational design of antiviral drug candidates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".