MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117559869 · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001167

Examining Canadian youth’s engagement with food companies via digital media

2025· article· en· W7117559869 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePLOS Digital Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Marketing and Social Media
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsOddsSocial mediaService (business)Logistic regressionDigital mediaFood serviceService providerObservational study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digital food marketing to youth is concerning given its widespread reach, engagement strategies and influence on lifelong food behaviours. Nonethless, little is known about youth's engagement (i.e., liking/sharing/following food companies on social media, having food company/restaurant/delivery service apps downloaded) with food companies via digital media, particularly in Canada. This study examined whether youth's digital engagement with food companies differed by sociodemographic characteristics in Canada. An observational cross-sectional online survey was conducted in 2023 among 1162 Canadian children (aged 10-12 years) and adolescents (13-17 years). Participants self-reported their sociodemographic information and engagement with food companies via digital media. Descriptive analyses and logistic regression models examined differences in engagement by gender, age group, race/ethnicity and income adequacy. Among all participants, 20.9% reported having liked, shared, or followed food/restaurant companies on social media, 23.1% had food/restaurant company apps on their smartphones, and 16.6% had apps for food delivery services. White participants and youth from medium income adequacy households had lower odds of having liked/shared/followed food companies on social media than racial/ethnic minority group participants (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.80) and those from low income adequacy households (OR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.80), respectively. Children and White participants had lower odds of reporting food company apps on their smartphones than adolescents (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.72) and racial/ethnic minority group participants (OR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.64), respectively. Children and White participants also had lower odds of reporting food delivery service apps on their smartphones than adolescents (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.72) and racial/ethnic minority group participants (OR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.44), respectively. No significant differences were observed between genders. Overall, many Canadian youth are engaging with food companies via digital media. Government-led food marketing regulations that extend to social media and food company and delivery service apps are warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it