MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117567800 · doi:10.1111/gequ.70033

Gender and Artistic Production in <i>Roter Himmel</i> ( <i>Afire</i> )

2025· article· en· W7117567800 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Ruth Hosek

Bibliographic record

VenueThe German Quarterly · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman History and Society
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrilogySubjectivityCapitalismPoliticsCharacter (mathematics)Identification (biology)Production (economics)Phrase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ChristianPetzold's oeuvre is the most successful and well-known of the Berlin School.Early films made in collaboration with the late Harun Farocki are known outside of the world of things German.For instance, the Gespenster (Ghosts) trilogy is popular among political economists for its incisive depictions of how capitalism shapes subjects and interpersonal relationships.Yella, Jerichow, and Barbara are known for their powerful female protagonists who filmically embody and express capitalist subsumption.Not psychologized, emotive, or physically sensual, these female figures are not meant to entice viewer identification or cathexis.They change little over the course of the narratives.Marxist-informed analysis considers the condition of woman a societal indicator; in these movies, the indicator gender expresses structural inequities through the experiences of the female lead characters.Roter Himmel's protagonist is male.The melodrama features the brooding, immature, insecure, and self-centered budding novelist Leon, centering his interior life and development.For instance, the film opens with a close-up and closes with a medium close-up of Leon's face, shot types that typically invite viewers into the subjectivity of characters.Furthermore, the camera repeatedly features his visage, body, and actions in rather slow takes and sequences that frame little else of interest, thereby also drawing attention to this character.Bumbling grumpily along as events unfold around him, Leon is the least charming, talented, socially adept, and/or attractive character in the narrative.His awkwardness is frequently derided early on.Notably, his negational phrase "die Arbeit lässt es nicht zu" ["the work doesn't allow it"] comes off as infelicitously pompous and other characters variously react to it with gentle derision (Rodek).Yet, Leon also embodies privilege most fully due to his intersectional advantage-presenting as white, Western German, heterosexual, and part of the educated middle class (Bildungsbürger).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe German Quarterly→Same topicGerman History and Society→French-language works237,207→