QU-Net: Quantum-Enhanced U-Net for Self Supervised Embedding and Classification of Skin Cancer Images
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has attracted significant attention in recent years. With quantum computing achievements in computationally costly domains, discovering its potential in improving the performance and efficiency of deep learning models in medical imaging has become a promising field of research. Methods: We investigate QML in healthcare by developing a novel quantum-enhanced U-Net (QU-Net). We experiment with six configurations of parameterized quantum circuits, varying the encoding technique (amplitude vs. angle), depth and entanglement. Using the ISIC-2017 skin cancer dataset, we compare QU-Net with classical U-Net on self-supervised image reconstruction and binary classification of benign and malignant skin cancer, where we combine bottleneck embeddings with patient metadata. Results: Our findings show that amplitude encoding stabilizes training, whereas angle encoding introduces fluctuations. The best performance is obtained with amplitude encoding and one layer. For reconstruction, QU-Net with entanglement converges faster (25 epochs vs. 44) with a lower Mean Squared Error per image (0.00015 vs. 0.00017) on unseen data. For classification, QU-Net with no entanglement embeddings reaches 79.03% F1-score compared with 74.14% for U-Net, despite compressing images to a smaller latent space (7 vs. 128). Conclusions: These results demonstrate that the quantum layer enhances U-Net’s expressive power with efficient data embedding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it