MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117678311 · doi:10.31881/tlr.2025.1231

Fiber Materials and Musical Perception: Exploring Tactile Transmission of Sound

2025· article· W7117678311 on OpenAlexaff
Jing Wen, Siyu Wang, Zhao Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueTextile & Leather Review · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTactile and Sensory Interactions
Canadian institutionsFPInnovations
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTextileVibrationWearable technologyFiberWearable computerTransmission (telecommunications)AccelerometerTactile sensor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: This study aims to systematically evaluate the performance of functional textile materials as vibrotactile feedback media. By characterizing the vibration transmission properties of various fabrics, we provide a materials science basis for developing novel wearable devices for music perception among hearing-impaired individuals. Methods: The experiment utilized three representative engineering textiles: polyester, nylon, and carbon fiber woven fabrics. Piezoelectric sensing technology was employed to convert audio signals into mechanical vibrations. Accelerometers were used to precisely measure the vibration conduction efficiency of each fabric, while 240 participants were recruited to assess tactile recognition rates. The research focused on the influence of different fiber raw materials and fabric structures (e.g., plain, twill) on vibration transmission performance. Results: The results demonstrate that the carbon fiber plain weave fabric exhibited optimal vibration conduction efficiency (4.85 m/s² in the low-frequency range <250 Hz), significantly outperforming the nylon and polyester fabrics. Tactile feedback based on this high-performance textile yielded a recognition rate of 92% for low-frequency music. Furthermore, the rhythm perception accuracy of the hearing-impaired group improved to 85%, proving the distinct advantage of advanced textile materials in the high-fidelity transmission of low-frequency vibrations. Conclusion: This research validates that textile-based substrates can serve as effective media for tactile music transmission. By virtue of its superior mechanical vibration transmission, carbon fiber fabric provides critical material science data and design parameters for the development of “smart textiles” and wearable sensing devices tailored for specific populations. This work shows broad application prospects in the interdisciplinary field of “textile engineering” and assistive rehabilitation technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTextile & Leather ReviewSame topicTactile and Sensory InteractionsFrench-language works237,207