Fiber Materials and Musical Perception: Exploring Tactile Transmission of Sound
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to systematically evaluate the performance of functional textile materials as vibrotactile feedback media. By characterizing the vibration transmission properties of various fabrics, we provide a materials science basis for developing novel wearable devices for music perception among hearing-impaired individuals. Methods: The experiment utilized three representative engineering textiles: polyester, nylon, and carbon fiber woven fabrics. Piezoelectric sensing technology was employed to convert audio signals into mechanical vibrations. Accelerometers were used to precisely measure the vibration conduction efficiency of each fabric, while 240 participants were recruited to assess tactile recognition rates. The research focused on the influence of different fiber raw materials and fabric structures (e.g., plain, twill) on vibration transmission performance. Results: The results demonstrate that the carbon fiber plain weave fabric exhibited optimal vibration conduction efficiency (4.85 m/s² in the low-frequency range <250 Hz), significantly outperforming the nylon and polyester fabrics. Tactile feedback based on this high-performance textile yielded a recognition rate of 92% for low-frequency music. Furthermore, the rhythm perception accuracy of the hearing-impaired group improved to 85%, proving the distinct advantage of advanced textile materials in the high-fidelity transmission of low-frequency vibrations. Conclusion: This research validates that textile-based substrates can serve as effective media for tactile music transmission. By virtue of its superior mechanical vibration transmission, carbon fiber fabric provides critical material science data and design parameters for the development of “smart textiles” and wearable sensing devices tailored for specific populations. This work shows broad application prospects in the interdisciplinary field of “textile engineering” and assistive rehabilitation technology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.043 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it