MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117681821 · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.5c02735

Dynamic Surrogate Modeling Using Latent Variable Methods and Neural Networks for Market-Driven Operation of an Air Separation Unit

2025· article· en· W7117681821 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurrogate modelArtificial neural networkLatent variableOptimization problemSubspace topologyPrincipal component analysisComputation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a dynamic surrogate modeling framework that combines latent variable methods and neural networks for accurate and computationally efficient market-driven dynamic optimization of an air separation plant. The high-dimensional full-order model (FOM) consisting of ≈ 3800 states is projected onto a 10-dimensional latent subspace using principal component analysis (PCA). Following order reduction, a rectified linear unit (ReLU)-activated multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network is trained to compute step-ahead predictions of the latent states in addition to the squared prediction error (SPE) statistic of the step-ahead prediction. The ReLU network is embedded directly into a discrete time reformulation of the optimization problem using complementarity conditions, and a trust region is enforced during optimization by constraining the SPE along the prediction horizon to be within specified confidence limits. The latent variable-based surrogate model (LV-SM) is validated through multistep-ahead simulation case studies, demonstrating high prediction accuracy for restoration of not only the states directly relevant to optimization but also the entire original state-space. The LV-SM’s performance in dynamic optimization is studied using a market-driven optimization case study, where it achieves a solution nearly identical to the FOM with nearly 3 orders of magnitude reduction in computation time using a two-tiered optimization approach. The results of this work highlight the potential of the LV-SM as a substitute for high-dimensional and complex first-principles-based industrial process models, particularly for use in real-time operations applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it