19. Formation and Development of the System of Secular Secondary Education in Kharkiv (the Second Half of the 18th — the First Quarter of the 19th Century)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article examines the process of transformation of the system of secular secondary education in Kharkiv from the time of the overthrow of the Hetmanate in 1764 to the beginning of the 1830s, when the reactionary policy of the Russian Tsardom began to oppress the autonomy of educational institutions. Four stages in the development of the network of secular secondary education and trends that led to significant changes are identified. During this period, the tsarist government implemented a number of reforms in the educational sphere, which gradually destroyed the national character of education and gradually integrated Kharkiv educational institutions into the all-Russian system. The tsarist government's policy in the field of education is characterized.The socio-economic and socio-political circumstances of the transformation of secular secondary education, the course of educational reforms, their main directions and results are highlighted. The influence of state policy, public charitable organizations, Kharkiv University, Kharkiv elite, and teachers on the processes that took place in the sphere of secondary education, and the results of its development are revealed.In addition to the state network of secular secondary educational institutions, private secondary education was also beginning to emerge at that time. Significant for the establishment and opening of private boarding houses and girls' institutes were the steps taken by the city's advanced intelligentsia, which actively expanded the network of educational institutions and financed them. In this context, the problems of the development of women's and private education are analyzed.The influence of the charitable society on the financing and improvement of the material base of private educational institutions is studied.The dynamics of the growth of secondary educational institutions, their main types are highlighted, the curricula, the educational process, and material and technical support are analyzed. The achievements and shortcomings of the contemporary system of secular secondary education are highlighted.The transformations that took place in the system of secular secondary education fully corresponded to the needs of the time. They contributed to an increase in the number of educational institutions and their varieties. Unfortunately, secondary education was losing its originality, its status and Russification were deepening.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".