MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Securing Agentic AI in IoT Systems

2025· article· W7117758288 on OpenAlexaff
Sandra Kumi, Richard K. Lomotey, Ralph Deters

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware System Performance and Reliability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsProxy (statistics)Gateway (web page)Forwarding planeLatency (audio)Corporate governance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a dual-proxy, seven-plane gateway for agentic AI in IoT that separates data, control, security, autonomy, context/knowledge, coordination, and management concerns. A lightweight client-side proxy verifies, annotates, and signs requests, while a server-side proxy near the data plane enforces global policy and model routing. To govern autonomous AI, we add a Goal-Plan-Step sentinel that requires plan publication and step-level justifications, and we execute device commands through a Digital Twin. Our Rust/Actix-Web prototype hosts hot-swappable WebAssembly filters (Wasmtime). In closed-loop tests with 1,000 requests and 1–10 concurrent clients, median latency for the proxy-microservice invocations is below 0.8 seconds. Predictable behaviour persists up to 100 clients, with overload observed beyond 200 on a single GCP e2-medium host. These results indicate that governance and low-latency operation can be achieved for agentic IoT deployments with modest infrastructure requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware System Performance and ReliabilityFrench-language works237,207