MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7119487901 · doi:10.13016/m2flcr-m9cm

Fragility in a Togashi–Kaneko stochastic model with mutations

2025· article· en· W7119487901 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yi Fu, Hye-Won Kang, Wasiur R. KhudaBukhsh, Lea Popović, Grzegorz A. Rempala, Ruth J. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueMaryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrigins and Evolution of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilCharles Lee Powell FoundationOhio State UniversityUK Research and InnovationAmerican Institute of MathematicsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSensitivity (control systems)FragilityAutocatalysisStochastic modellingStochastic processProcess (computing)Property (philosophy)Ergodic theoryRelevance (law)Dynamical system (definition)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Togashi–Kaneko (TK) stochastic model is a prototypical example of an autocatalytic reaction network exhibiting dramatic switching behavior. The desire to understand this unusual behavior has attracted considerable attention in recent years. In this paper, we study the TK model with additional mutations. We establish a rigorous stochastic averaging principle that describes slow dynamics in terms of certain ergodic means of fast variables. Beginning with two species, we demonstrate a sensitivity of the model to even slight departures from symmetry in the autocatalytic reactions. We accomplish this through a detailed analysis of the stationary distribution of the fast process when the state of the slow process is fixed. We call this high sensitivity property “fragility”. We give some examples of behavior that can occur when there are more than two species. These preliminary explorations for multiple species point to a wealth of open questions for future research. Relevance to Life Sciences. Autocatalysis or self-amplification plays a key role in many biochemical and biological processes, ranging from pattern formation and self-organization, through gene regulation and signaling cascades, to ecological interactions and evolutionary dynamics. Understanding the sensitivity of such stochastic systems to small parameter changes is important for the formulation of models from data and for drawing conclusions for real life systems. In this paper we explore the sensitivity of the prototypical Togashi–Kaneko model with additional mutations. We find a high sensitivity to even slight departures from symmetry in the autocatalytic reactions, which we call fragility. We believe that fragility is an important underappreciated and understudied phenomenon, that will affect the formulation and interpretation of autocatalytic models across a wide variety of applications in the life sciences. Mathematical Content. We develop tools for analyzing and understanding the dynamic stochastic behavior of autocatalytic reaction systems, especially in asymmetric situations, by considering an extension of the standard TK model with additional mutation reactions. We prove a rigorous stochastic averaging principle that links the slow population dynamics with fast autocatalytic reactions. Through analysis of the ergodic mean of the fast variables (when the slow variables are frozen at a given value) for the two-species model, we find a high sensitivity of the model (which we call fragility) to even a slight departure from symmetry in autocatalytic rates. Furthermore, our preliminary explorations for more than two species suggest that such a phenomenon can occur for four species but not for three. This rather surprising observation suggests a wealth of open problems for future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)Same topicOrigins and Evolution of LifeFrench-language works237,207