Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current water crisis is disproportionately affecting many Indigenous communities across Canada, where the lack of access to water has life-threatening effects on Native health and, in particular, on Indigenous women and girls who are more vulnerable to waterborne infections and mental health problems resulting from water deprivation. Moreover, the inability to carry out their domestic tasks makes women more exposed to lateral violence within their households.To counter this violence against women and water, Indigenous women writers are drawing on their traditional knowledge to assert the sacredness of water and of women as water carriers and life-givers. As part of their broader decolonizing politics to oppose settler-colonialism and destructive views of the Earth as a commodity, they are reasserting their peoples’ traditional roles as water protectors and emphasizing the vital and transformative role of water as a source of life and renewal. This article analyses Katherena Vermette’s collection of poetry river woman and K Dawn Martin’s performative piece “Kahnekanoron – Water is Life” which offer a counter discourse to both the settler view of water as a source of profit and the migrant view of water as a passageway to an unknown Eden. The aim is to show how Indigenous views of water as a source of interconnection between humans, animals and nature offer an alternative to Western ideologies of exploitation of the Earth and to the colonial mindset that spurs unequal and violent relations among human beings. The woman-water connection elicited in these poems emphasizes the importance of both for our survival, but also sheds light on how both are intertwined as an effect of patriarchal violence. Ultimately, by celebrating water as a living being, these writers posit water as a site of resistance and healing from the wounds of colonization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".