MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Online Algorithm for Linear Optimal Power Flow Computations

2025· article· fr· W7124842502 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputationConvergence (economics)Power flowSublinear functionRegretOnline algorithmGridConvex functionFunction (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The conventional optimal power flow (OPF) formulation falls short when dealing with incomplete information in real-time operations. Recent studies propose OPF reformulations using online algorithms to cope with this limitation. However, existing implementations oversimplify grid models, resulting in noticeably unrealistic scenarios. This study employs a linear approximation of the power flow balance equation that convexifies the problem while preserving reactive power flows and voltage variables within the analysis. Thus, the OPF is formulated as an online convex optimization problem and solved using primaldual updates. This study presents the update equations using the Lagrangian function that minimizes the dynamic regret. The proposed algorithm is tested on the IEEE 33-bus test system to validate its convergence and analyze application opportunities. The results demonstrate that the algorithm converges with sublinear regret and fulfills the OPF security constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207