MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7125605620 · doi:10.64449/9781997468479-04

Theoretical Reflections on Knowledge Production and Teaching Africa

2025· book-chapter· en· W7125605620 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUJ Press eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican cultural and philosophical studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKnowledge productionProduction (economics)Position (finance)Knowledge economyProduction modelKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knowledge production and the related implications for teaching have assumed a vital position in our knowledge-driven twenty-first century society. In the case of Africa, that is often misconceived and portrayed in a negative light, the issue of how knowledge is produced and taught becomes necessary. African universities, as centres for knowledge production and teaching, have embarked upon changes because of or in response to the twenty-first century forces of neoliberal globalisation. The changing role of the state, one feature of neoliberal globalisation, has given rise to the dwindling role of public resources for African universities. In response, universities have initiated various changes that coalesce around the idea of entrepreneurial universities (Feola et al, 2021; Puplampu & Wodinski, 2016). Key aspects of such universities include plans on how to utilise technology in knowledge production and transfer, to the recruitment of faculty and students from beyond national borders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it