MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Secrecy-Driven Robust Beamforming Under Age of Information Constraints for Satellite-Terrestrial Integrated Networks

2025· article· W7125893818 on OpenAlexaff
Mingyi Ji, Haitao Zhao, Huaicong Kong, Bo Xu, Haibo Dai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEavesdroppingProbabilistic logicBeamformingArtificial noisePhysical layerRobustness (evolution)Channel state informationChannel (broadcasting)Secrecy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a robust secure beamforming (BF) strategy that incorporates information freshness into the physical layer security (PLS) design of satellite-terrestrial integrated network (STIN). In the considered framework, satellite networks serve earth stations in the presence of multiple eavesdroppers, while terrestrial networks, operating over the same spectrum, provide multicast services to ground users. To capture the dynamics of status update timeliness, we model the evolution of the Age of Information (AoI) using a discrete-time Markov chain, taking into account both the activation thresholds and access probabilities of users. Based on this model, we derive a closed-form expression for the secrecy margin of the wiretap channel, thereby jointly quantifying data freshness and communication security. Assuming imperfect channel state information, we formulate an optimization problem to maximize the average secrecy margin, subject to constraints on average AoI, quality of service (QoS), eavesdropping probability, and total transmit power. To tackle the inherent non-convexity caused by probabilistic constraints, we adopt Bernstein-type inequalities to transform them into tractable deterministic equivalents. An efficient solution algorithm is then developed by integrating successive convex approximation with difference-of-convex programming, enabling effective computation of the optimal BF vectors. Extensive simulation results confirm that the proposed approach achieves notable improvements over existing methods in both secrecy performance and information freshness, offering a unified and practical solution for secure and timely communication in future 6 G integrated networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAge of Information OptimizationFrench-language works237,207