MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preservation

2025· book-chapter· en· W7127124498 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Press of Mississippi eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSpatial and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHEROQuarter (Canadian coin)ArchitectureGeorge (robot)QueerDemolitionModernization theoryGovernorStyle (visual arts)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter examines how gay men safeguarded the French Quarter when modernization threatened its historic architecture and identity. It highlights Allison Owen, who opposed the demolition of the Cabildo, and William Ratcliffe Irby, whose philanthropy preserved landmarks such as the French Opera House and supported St. Louis Cathedral's renovation. The chapter continues with the 1920s French Quarter Renaissance, where Lyle Saxon, Richard Koch, William Spratling, and others fostered salons, theater, and the Arts and Crafts Club, transforming a declining district into a cultural hub worth preserving. It also recalls Clay Shaw, a war hero and businessman whose preservation work, including renovating Governor Nicholls Street properties, was later overshadowed by his controversial trial. Finally, the chapter examines efforts by the National Park Service to recognize LGBT+ landmarks, affirming queer contributions to New Orleans heritage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it