MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7130546602 · doi:10.7202/1122178ar

Que faire des lois économiques naturelles dans Le Capital

2024· article· fr· W7130546602 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueEurostudia · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Economy and Marxism
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNaturalisationContext (archaeology)Capital (architecture)Order (exchange)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Si Marx est connu pour avoir efficacement critiqué la naturalisation des lois économiques par l’économie politique bourgeoise, son propre usage répété du concept de « loi économique naturelle », au sein du premier livre du Capital , l’est beaucoup moins. Ce court article a précisément pour objectif de rendre compte d’un tel usage – à première vue paradoxal –, en le replaçant dans le cadre de sa critique plus générale de l’économie politique. On verra ainsi, à travers l’analyse d’extraits clés, que cette critique s’opère par un double mouvement de dénaturalisation/naturalisation de l’économie capitaliste, dont la fonction commune est de discréditer les discours que le capitaliste et son interprète théorique tiennent sur le monde. Il sera démontré par là que la naturalisation de l’économie produit des effets a priori indéterminés et que leur teneur politique dépend en réalité du type de « nature » (figée versus muable) auquel elle renvoie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it