MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131084565 · doi:10.37905/ljpmt.v4i2.31807

Literasi Digital dan Pemanfaatan Media Sosial dalam Pembelajaran: Program Pendampingan Guru di SMK Permas Jaya 2 dan Sekolah Indonesia Johor Bahru, Malaysia

2025· article· id· W7131084565 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLAMAHU Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Terintegrasi · 2025
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Media Use
Canadian institutionsEducation and Early Childhood Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital literacyTest (biology)LiteracyDigital learningDigital mediaSocial media

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Improving the level of training and ability of educators to create technology-integrated instruction has become important in the current digital age, especially at Sekolah Indonesia Johor Bahru (SIJB) and Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Permas Jaya 2 (SMK Permas Jaya 2) in Malaysia. Making the best use of social media and digital apps in their teaching and learning processes presents difficulties for both institutions. Thirteen teachers from SMK Permas Jaya 2 and ten from SIJB participated in this community service program, which aimed to enhance their knowledge and practical abilities in using digital and artificial intelligence (AI) programs such Canva, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Grammarly, and Book Creator. Pretest and post test assessments were used in conjunction with lessons, discussions, demonstrations, and practical exercises. According to pretest results, the majority of teachers understood digital literacy at a moderate level, but they still lacked the practical abilities to use digital apps. The majority of teachers advanced to the "good" and "excellent" categories in terms of their proficiency with these programs and their ability to produce interactive digital learning resources after the mentoring sessions, indicating a notable improvement. Teachers' successful integration of digital resources into their classroom instruction is proof of the program's tangible impact, as demonstrated by improved practical skills. Direct mentoring helped solve a number of technical challenges that arose during practice. All things considered, this digital literacy mentoring program successfully increased the ability of teachers at both schools, especially when it came to using technology to produce more engaging and creative learning environments. It is advised that similar initiatives be maintained, emphasizing more advanced instruction and better technology infrastructure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it