MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132018814

Mexico-United States An Uncertain Future

2025· other· en· W7132018814 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMiCISAN · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtectionismHegemonyPopulismPoliticsExceptionalismContext (archaeology)AuthoritarianismIdeologyProsperity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current moment in North America demonstrates the wisdom of the unam in having an entity such as the CISAN, which conducts multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research on the United States and Canada and their relations with Mexico and the world. And now is a great opportunity for us to present the voices of leading experts and their analyses of the current situation in the region. This issue takes an in-depth and thoughtful look at the United States during Donald Trump’s second term, as we present articles that address the economic, political, social, and cultural impacts of this nascent administration. Here we illustrate how populism and hyper-politicization have transformed the country’s political structure by concentrating power in executive orders that weaken democratic institutions and threaten human rights—a phenomenon that is part of a global context of tensions—where the United States seeks to regain its political and economic hegemony through protectionist strategies and polarizing rhetoric. In the economic sphere, this issue examines the consequences of Trump’s tariff and protectionist policies, which have created uncertainty both in the United States and among its trading partners, especially Mexico and Canada. These measures have weakened regional economic integration and affected production chains. And contrary to the reality of shared manufacturing, the strategy discourages nearshoring and has led to instability in financial markets. In the political arena, we present an article that analyzes how Trump has used the ideology of exceptionalism and authoritarian rhetoric to consolidate his power and redefine world order. His administration has militarized borders, promoted xenophobia, and outsourced security policies, which has radicalized social divisions and generated a climate of misinformation and post-truth. The hyper-politicization of social life has prioritized capricious decisions over structural reforms, opening the door to authoritarianism and weakening democratic values. On a related note, in the social context this issue reviews the impact of aggressive and noisy immigration policies and the discourse of fear that permeates migrant communities—especially agricultural workers and Latino groups. These policies have exacerbated anxiety and fear, as well as increasing racial discrimination and inequality, fostering internal divisions within Latino communities with narratives of order and security, which requires an active response from cultural diplomacy to promote respect and inclusion. In the cultural realm, we present an article that addresses the censorship of lgbtq literature and the rollback of environmental and food policies, as Trump has dismantled advances in the fight against climate change and promoted programs that respond to corporate interests and conservative values, affecting food justice. VoM responds to its responsibility to analyze these problems from a critical and multidisciplinary perspective, while defending a perspective that strengthens democratic values, international cooperation, and social justice. As researchers, we are committed to presenting our research findings to a wide audience in order to understand how these political games impact the global and regional economy; to preserve the principles of pluralism and human rights; to understand the complexities of social coexistence and propose strategies that foster cohesion and mutual respect. In short, our goal is to highlight the importance of resisting cultural censorship, while supporting artistic and literary production that defends diversity and freedom of expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMiCISANFrench-language works237,207