Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation argues that understanding Japan-South Asia relations during the first half of the 20th century (1915-1952) provides a method for explicating the linkages and complicities among empire, nationalism, and internationalism in the modern world. It joins a growing body of literature that adopts a transnational and trans-imperial approach to analyze Japan’s relationship with the world beyond the traditional area studies reference points of the West and East Asia. Bringing critical studies of British and Japanese imperialism together with postcolonial theory, I show how the imperial and nationalist visions of both Japanese Pan-Asianists and prominent Indian independence activists were mutually constitutive projects that were welded together through appeals to cultural and spiritual authenticity. In other words, visions of Pan-Asian community were inseparable from empire and nation in the non-European world even as such visions articulated a universalism that attempted to resist the West. During and after the First World War, Pan-Asianists in Japan mobilized the language of national self-determination to advocate for the establishment of a regional order in the Asia-Pacific that would challenge Euro-American colonialism, while also affirming the universalization of Japan as the guiding model of an authentic “Asian” modernity. This was evinced through the establishment of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere as an empire of client-states, similar to what the United States and the Soviet Union were undertaking in their own ideological registers through the League of Nations and the Third International. Indian nationalists on the other hand, particularly Hindu nationalists, looked to Japan and to some extent Manchukuo as a model of modernization and progress without compromising the authentic spiritual values of their nation. The allure of Pan-Asianist rhetoric, which combined both Orientalism and revolutionary nationalism, appealed to a wide range of middle-class Indian nationalists, including the often-celebrated Subhas Chandra Bose who led the Indian National Army and established the Free India government with Japanese military and diplomatic support. However, such complicities between these groups in their imperial and nation-building projects, especially during the Asia-Pacific War, obscured the violence committed against minorities and labouring classes. Far from celebrating the transnational as an effective method to critique imperialism, this dissertation explores the Japan-South Asia case to highlight how transnational encounters and alliances were both conditioned by, and complicit in, imperialism and nationalism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".