MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133412246

Environmental Education in Context: An International Perspective on the Development of Environmental Education

2009· book· en· W7133412246 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Neil C Taylor, Michael Littledyke, Chris Eames, Richard K. Coll

Bibliographic record

VenueRUNE (Research UNE) · 2009
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Education and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental educationEnvironmental adult educationScope (computer science)Government (linguistics)Environmental degradationAction (physics)SternPerspective (graphical)Environmental law
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book presents an international perspective on the development and implementation of environmental education (EE). We are living at a time when environmental issues are receiving unprecedented attention. Much of this focus is on climate change, largely as a result of the Kyoto Protocol of 2005, the Stern Report, presented to the UK government in 2006, which predicted dire economic consequences of global warming, and the release of Al Gore's movie 'An Inconvenient Truth', which made this issue accessible to the general public. As Skamp, Boyes, and Stanisstreet (2007) argue, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and addressing other problems associated with the environment is a government, corporate, and community responsibility, as well as an individual responsibility. But key to effecting change is an informed citizenry, because awareness of an environmental issue is a precondition of taking environmental action (Jensen, 2002). Consequently, effective EE—both formal and non-formal—is seen as a vital component of the fight against environmental degradation globally. There is, however, much debate as to what form EE should take. In the last few decades, there have been growing concerns that traditional EE (education 'about' the environment) is too limited in its scope to effect the necessary attitudinal and behavioural changes needed if ecological degradation is to be reduced. The Australian educator Arthur Lucas was one of the first to recognize this, arguing that education about the environment was not sufficient. Rather, rich learning experiences must also include learning 'in' the environment and learning 'for' the environment, or the taking of action to improve outcomes (Lucas, 1979). This theme has been further developed by a number of authors. Uzzell, Rutland, and Whistance (1995), for example, argue that students should have the opportunity to actively resolve environmental issues in a democratic way at the local level, firstly so they understand how these issues relate to their own lives, and secondly so they are encouraged by the success of their actions. Likewise, Jensen's (2002) model of "action competence" is designed not only to provide students with a sound understanding of environmental issues but also to allow them to take action to address these at a local level. This action competence model can combat the "action paralysis and disempowerment" that students may experience when confronted with what appear to be insurmountable environmental problems and help them to become advocates for the environment (Connell et al., 1999). The model also addresses the issue of presenting the environment as a series of problems. Other authors (e.g., Bullard, 1993; Kothari & Parajuli, 1993; O'Connor, 1989) have called for links to be made between ecological sustainability and social justice. Third World First (1990) echoes this view when they state that wealthy "middle class" people have the luxury of the "privilege of concern," because they have the financial ability to look beyond their own livelihood, explore global issues, and make the connections between the environmental and wealth generations. In contrast, people from lower socioeconomic groups do not have the option of such "luxury," and it is only when they are involved in a practical and direct way with their local environment that they too can go on to make such connections. Furthermore, tensions are now emerging between western and non-western (particularly developing) countries as to who should take responsibility for climate change and other problems, and to what extent developing countries may have to shoulder any adverse economic consequence of dealing with problems largely viewed as having been created by rapid western development. Against this background, this book explores developments in EE in the formal and non-formal sectors of non-western countries (loosely interpreted, these sectors include countries outside of the English-speaking block of the UK, the USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand), where there is increasing tension between the desire for rapid economic development and the need for ecological sustainability. The intention is to provide the reader with a picture of the developments that are taking place in EE across a range of non-western countries, especially given that little has been written about these countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.020
Scholarly communication0.0150.014
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0070.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRUNE (Research UNE)Same topicEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207