Mission Impossible: Causes behind the Abandonment of Mission Stations in Nias between 1865 to 1890
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In places where, today, Christianity is successfully established, the historical narrative is often one of growth: tracing the path from the first converts to the seemingly inevitable triumph of Christianity. Within such a narrative, little attention is given to the failures and disappointments that occurred along the way. This article analyses a large collection of missionary letters from the recently digitized Nias archive of the Rheinische Missionsgesellschaft , to investigate the abandonment of three mission stations during the first decades of the mission. These stories of failure highlight how major factors, like colonial power, as well as idiosyncratic elements or even singular events, can steer the fate of a mission station in unexpected ways. The article aims to broaden knowledge of the early history of Niasan Christianity, and to show how points of divergence, misalignment and resistance can contribute to our understanding of the complex dynamics involved in missionary encounters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it