Escaping Austerity: How Abundance Can Save Progressive Governments
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The UK's current political stagnation stems from a lack of growth, which has forced the government into a zero‐sum "politics of austerity" and a lost tax revenue of £150 billion annually compared to US growth rates. To escape this, progressives must embrace an "abundance agenda" that prioritizes building homes, cheap energy, and modern infrastructure. This requires shifting the narrative from abstract GDP figures to tangible public benefits while aggressively distinguishing genuine innovation from corporate rent‐seeking. Furthermore, the government should adopt a "flexicurity" model to protect workers during the AI‐led industrial revolution, ensuring that technological disruption leads to shared prosperity rather than obsolescence. Ultimately, abundance is the only viable "Third Way" to fund radical state action and restore public faith in liberal democracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it