MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Climate Change Scenarios in the Southern Caribbean region of Central America

2025· article· en· W7135197193 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Biología Tropical · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Environmental Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVicerrectoría de Investigación, Universidad de Costa RicaUniversidad de Costa RicaConsejo Superior Universitario CentroamericanoInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsDownscalingPrecipitationClimate changeCoupled model intercomparison projectGeneral Circulation ModelGlobal warmingAridPer capita

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Warming is already significant in Central America and the Caribbean and may be magnified even further in the future. A decrease in the precipitation is projected, increasing also regional aridity. Objective: To study observed and projected latitudinal gradients for precipitation and temperature in three Southern Caribbean locations of Central America: Bluefields (Nicaragua), Limón (Costa Rica) and Bocas del Toro (Panamá) and to characterize their future changes and determine if there are differences or similarities in a north-south direction. Methods: Monthly precipitation (P) and temperature (T) data from General Circulation Models from 1979 to 2099, were downloaded from the WRF repository. Data from the selected models from the repository were subjected to a delta-type statistical downscaling to bring them to a resolution of 1 x 1 km. These models are part of the latest generation of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project-Phase 6 used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The ground-truth data necessary for bias correction were obtained from the ERA5 reanalysis. Monthly P and T data were downloaded from 1979 to 2014 at different native spatial resolutions and climatologies at 1 x 1 km spatial resolution at global scales were obtained from WorldClim data. Results: Scenarios show that some regions would go from very humid to humid, based on strong reductions in precipitation and warming at the end of the 21st century. This expected increase in the aridity is going to have impacts on ecology and ecosystem services, agriculture, human consumption due to a water availability reduction per capita and hydroelectric generation. Conclusions: Generation of high spatial Climate Change scenarios is necessary because Central America is a region characterized by significant topographic complexity, land use variety and spatial occurrence of hydrometeorological disasters. This intrinsic variability suggests that local risk management and planning strategies must be designed with a highly specific approach to each locality or region. This implies that, even in areas geographically near to each other, the measures taken may not necessarily be transferable due to differences in climate projections, as it was found for the three nearby communities in the Southern Central American Caribbean coastal region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it