CASE STUDY: Wayne State University Takes the Lead in Library and Information Science Using Mediasite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Wayne State University Library and Information Science Program can trace its origins to 1918, when the Detroit Normal Training School began offering courses in school librarianship to elementary teachers in the Detroit Public School system. After the training school became the Detroit Teachers College in 1923, the library science program grew and it remains one of only only 57 American Library Association-accredited degree programs of library and information science in the United States and Canada. In recognition of the growth of the program and the expansion of its curriculum, the name of the program was changed to the Library and Information Science Program (adding information science) in 1993. The program has 15 full-time and 60 part-time faculty members.Joseph Mika, then director of the Library and Information Science Program, sought to take advantage of a technology that would enhance student learning. The school already had transitioned from a successful on-site program to four off-campus sites to offering online courses using the Blackboard course management system. The next logical step seemed to be the integration of live classes for remote students.Mika discovered Mediasite while attending a recruitment meeting for directors and assistant deans more than 2 years ago. At that meeting, he spoke with the assistant dean of the university business school, who raved about Mediasite, so Mika went to see it in operation. About 2 months later, the Library and Information Science Program had its own Mediasite system.“I went after something I knew worked and had a chance to observe,” said Mika. “The equipment itself is very straightforward and easy to use. It only took a matter of hours to get up and running after watching the demo by Sonic Foundry personnel and using the technology ourselves.”The Wayne State University Library and Information Science Program utilizes Mediasite to capture a minimum of 25–28 recordings per month. Seven teachers capture four lectures per week. Program faculty have affectionately nicknamed Mediasite “ECHO,” which stands for “enhancing courses held online.” “I love Mediasite,” said John Heinrichs, assistant professor in library and information science. “It’s a whole new way of teaching. Now I can stop, run polls to see if students understand the content. I can see if there are any questions being keyed into the moderator function and answer those right away.”Working students also are able to save time that otherwise would be spent in transit between school and their places of employment. In fact, some employers are so appreciative that their student employees can remain on-site, they allow them to view Mediasite classes at the office or at another convenient location. “The students seem to really love it,” said Heinrichs. “They don’t have to travel during tumultuous Michigan winters and are able to review lectures—stop and replay, which they obviously can’t do in a conventional classroom environment.”Besides online course content, Mediasite now is being used to capture new student orientations. “We used to require students to come to our campus for orientation classes. Now we can capture orientation online and provide a virtual orientation,” said Mika. Additionally, Mika recently received a grant that would allow department faculty to offer mediasite continuing education curricula to rural librarians not wishing to undertake a master’s degree.Mediasite has changed Heinrichs’ very own approach to teaching. Since the program purchased Mediasite, Heinrichs takes care to enunciate his words and to avoid meandering around the classroom as he drives home a compelling point. Heinrichs now uses masking tape to corner off the area in which he must remain so that he can be sure to be visually captured by Mediasite.“It’s not a question of saving money. It’s more an issue of increasing the student body by reaching remote individuals who otherwise would not be in our program,” Mika said. “Mediasite is helping us expand the benefits of our teachings as well as increase our student enrollment,” said Heinrichs. “It’s not just a teaching and learning tool; it’s a driver of growth.”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".