MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7148627237 · doi:10.71465/ajbd780

Big Data for Enhancing Customer Experience in Digital Marketing

2023· article· W7148627237 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal Of Big Data · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBig Data Technologies and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataDigital marketingPurchasingCustomer advocacyCustomer intelligencePersonalized marketingCustomer experienceProduct (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the digital age, marketing strategies have evolved significantly with the advent of Big Data technologies. Digital marketing leverages vast amounts of consumer data to gain insights into customer preferences, behaviors, and purchasing patterns. By utilizing Big Data analytics, businesses can create personalized and targeted marketing campaigns that enhance the customer experience. This paper explores the role of Big Data in digital marketing, discussing how it can be used to personalize content, optimize customer journeys, improve product recommendations, and drive customer loyalty. It also addresses the challenges and ethical concerns related to the use of Big Data in marketing, such as privacy issues, data security, and consumer trust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0190.011
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.434
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.006 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it