MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7152555998 · doi:10.4000/161ez

Du Ballet en Amérique. Fernand Léger et son film aux États-Unis

2024· article· fr· W7152555998 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue1895 · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary art, education, critique
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalletExoticismContext (archaeology)Alterity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sur la base d’une approche transnationale et chrono-thématique, cet article se propose d’explorer à nouveaux frais la diffusion de Ballet mécanique en Amérique (États-Unis et Canada), tout en s’intéressant aux personnes qui ont joué un rôle majeur dans son introduction à sa réception. Est étudiée l’empreinte laissée par le film sur le public américain et certains cinéastes (comme Norman McLaren), le fait qu’il soit une référence souvent citée par la jeune génération de cinéastes étatsuniens, offrant ainsi un éclairage sur la manière dont ces interactions ont contribué à façonner le paysage artistique et culturel de l’époque. Fernand Léger, admirateur de ce pays qu’il qualifie de « monde », y séjourna cinq ans durant pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, au cours desquels il collabora à deux films : Fernand Léger in America. His New Realism (Thomas Bouchard, 1945) et Dreams That Money Can Buy (Hans Richter, 1947).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it