MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7153434397 · doi:10.59236/td2025vol18iss41928

Journeying into SoTL: A Transformative Experience Through the SPARK-ENG Professional Learning

2025· article· W7153434397 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransformative Dialogues Teaching and Learning Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEvaluation of Teaching Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsTransformative learningScholarship of Teaching and LearningProfessional learning communityProfessional developmentEngineering educationScholarshipDisciplineProfessional studiesExperiential learningEducational technology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In engineering education, the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) offers a pathway for educators to advance their professional learning and teaching practices. However, the perception of SoTL as less rigorous than traditional disciplinary research often discourages faculty engagement. Additionally, while engineering educators possess strong technical expertise in their respective fields, they often lack the knowledge, skills, and resources necessary for conducting educational research. These challenges were particularly evident among engineering educators at our university, a major Canadian institution. To address these gaps, we developed the SPARK-ENG program—a modular professional learning initiative providing support for engineering educators in their SoTL journey.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0430.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.008
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.023
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it