MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ANALISIS POLA PEMBELAJARAN DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BERDIFERENSIASI PADA ERA SOCIETY 5.0 SEBAGAI IMPLEMENTASI KURIKULUM MERDEKA

2025· article· W7154364804 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGEOGRAPHY Jurnal Kajian Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Curriculum and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsNorth American Construction Group (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComicsVariety (cybernetics)School teachers

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstrak: Menurut Tomlinson, guru dapat menggunakan berbagai macam aktivitas dalam pembelajaran berdiferensiasi untuk memenuhi kebutuhan setiap siswa, maka diharapkan seluruh siswa dapat mempelajari materi sesuai dengan pemahaman dan kemampuan masing-masing, mencegah terjadinya frustasi dan menumbuhkan kenyamanan dalam proses pembelajaran di era society 5.0 yang berlatar belakang sosial yang menuntut pembelajaran inovatif dan berbasis teknologi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas pola pembelajaran yang menggunakan teknologi dalam pembelajaran berdiferensiasi pada Kurikulum Merdeka di kelas VII SMPN 1 Pemenang. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif untuk mengeksplorasi fenomena yang terjadi di lapangan melalui metode observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan e-learning dengan metode blended learning atau hybrid yang menggabungkan pembelajaran secara daring dan tatap muka mampu menciptakan pengalaman belajar yang lebih komprehensif dan signifikan karena penggunaannya mampu meningkatkan efektivitas dengan penerapan metode dan inovasi pemanfaatan media bagi siswa dalam peningkatan pemahaman, ketrampilan belajar secara mandiri juga mampu menilai diri sendiri. Selain itu, metode ini juga melibatkan orang tua dimana hal ini sekaligus dapat mempersiapkan siswa untuk menghadapi tantangan dunia nyata dengan keterampilan yang lebih baik. Abstract: According to Tomlinson, teachers can implement a variety of learning activities in differentiated instruction to address the diverse needs of students. This approach ensures that students can engage with the material according to their respective levels of understanding and ability, thereby minimizing frustration and fostering comfort in the learning process. In the era of Society 5.0—characterized by a socially-driven demand for innovation and technology-based education—differentiated learning becomes increasingly relevant. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of technology-integrated learning patterns within differentiated instruction as implemented in the Independent Curriculum. Using a qualitative research approach, this study explores real-world phenomena through observation, interviews, and documentation. The findings reveal that employing e-learning through blended or hybrid learning models, which combine online and face-to-face instruction, offers a more holistic and impactful learning experience. This method enhances learning effectiveness by integrating diverse strategies and innovative media to support student comprehension, independence, and self-assessment skills. Moreover, the involvement of parents in this approach contributes to preparing students for real-world challenges by equipping them with more adaptive and relevant competencies

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.239
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.005
Bibliometrics0.0020.009
Science and technology studies0.0100.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it