MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7154632061 · doi:10.66573/001c.115924

Modeling of Fire Contagion in Farms Insurance

2024· article· en· W7154632061 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVariance · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural risk and resilience
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProperty insuranceFunction (biology)Insurance premiumRisk modelRisk premium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a farm, a fire that starts in any structure can spread to all other structures of that same farm, to barns, granaries, silos, etc.. Intuitively, we then expect that a farm with more structures will be more at risk of fire propagation than a smaller one. From an actuarial perspective, as the total premium for farm insurance is the sum of premiums of each structure of that farm, it is therefore necessary to propose a way to compute each premium by considering the risk of fire propagation. Based on the distances between structures on the same farm, we propose a new pricing approach that considers fire propagation. The proposed model makes it possible to analytically compute the probability of fire propagation as a function of the fire origin. This can in turn be used to price all individual structures of any given farm. A practical application of the model based on insurance data and satellite images is given. Address for Correspondence: boucher.jean-philippe@uqam.ca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it