MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7160654747 · doi:10.33679/rfn.v3i6.1605

Perspectivas sobre el libre comercio: un estudio comparado de empresas mexicanas y canadienses

2017· article· W7160654747 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontera norte · 2017
Typearticle
Language
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Free trade agreementBusiness environmentFree trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabajo es de naturaleza empírica; se resumen los resultados de una investigación sobre las opiniones de pequeñas y medianas empresas manufactureras en México y Canadá en relación con la firma de un Acuerdo de Libre Comercio a nivel continental. Estas opiniones, se deduce, son el resultado de las condiciones estructurales de las firmas ante la economía internacional. Los resultados se basan en una encuesta tripartita de empresas en México, Canadá y Estados Unidos. La investigación fue guiada por consideraciones teóricas y prácticas encaminadas a entender cuáles son las formas y mecanismos de respuesta por parte de estas firmas ante la liberalización comercial y ante la competencia de empresas trasnacionales. A final de cuentas, una de las preocupaciones principales de este trabajo es el efecto que la liberalización comercial en la forma de un Acuerdo de Libre Comercio tendrá sobre los trabajadores ocupados por este tipo de empresas. Igualmente, este trabajo sienta las bases empíricas para una política pública encaminada a solucionar los problemas de este sector de la economía. La conclusión más evidente a la que llega este trabajo es que empresas de este tipo no exhiben, en términos generales, las condiciones necesarias para competir a nivel internacional y que el trabajo de restructuración de este sector requiere de cambios fundamentales para los cuales no están preparadas las empresas.ABSTRACTThis study, based on empirical research, summarizes the results of a survey to measure the opinions that small and mid-sized Canadian and Mexican manufacturing firms hold of a Continental Free Trade Agreement. These opinions are believe to stem from the structural conditions of these firms as they relate to the global economy. The data were gathered through a questionnaire survey of United States, Mexican, and Canadian firms. This research combined theoretical and pragmatic approaches in an effort to determine the types of responses and mechanisms that these firms will employ as they come face to face with trade liberalization and transnational industrial competition.A primary concern of the research is the impact that trade liberalization, in the form of a Free Trade Afreement, will have on workers employed in manufacturing firms. The study sets the empirical foundations for formulating public policy aime at solving the problems in this economic sector. The principal conclusion is that small and mid-sized manufacturing firms do not generally display the characteristics required to compete at the international level, and that any restructuring of the sector will require fundamental changes for wich these companies are not prepared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it