MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7165431124

Seaweed aquaculture: the case of Laminaria digitata

2023· dissertation· el· W7165431124 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Thessaly Institutional Repository (University of Thessaly) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageel
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSeaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaminaria digitataAlgaeLaminariaFishingProductivityProduction (economics)Raw materialProduct (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the last 20 years, algae cultivation and production has increased significantly and plays an important role in the fishing industry.Global algae production in 2022 was estimated at more than 35 million tonnes.Algae, in their various forms, have a multitude of applications that enhance the social and economic importance of cultivation worldwide.The European market for algae is expanding due to the growing demand for alternative and sustainable sources of protein and products with nutritional benefits.Consequently, the cultivation of various types of micro-and macro-algae is also increasing.The present study compiles information from the international literature on the cultivation of macroalgae, particularly of Laminaria digitata, an endemic species of northern Europe and the west coast of North America and Canada.A description is given of its cultivation in a longline system, which includes the growth of the algae in both laboratory , and natural aquatic environments.A number of socio-economic and environmental benefits, as well as various uses of the species, are then discussed.These include: its use as food for humans and VI animals; its contribution to the pharmaceutical industry through the various extracts it produces (e.g.alginates, carrageenans, chlorotannins); and the potential substitution of fossil raw materials through the production of bioplastics and biofuels.Positive environmental impacts are highlighted, such as the provision of ecosystem services (e.g.for the assessment of water quality characteristics and the restoration of polluted marine systems through the capture of nitrogen, phosphorus and other substances).Finally, the challenges of macroalgae cultivation are highlighted and the need to provide incentives at all stages of the product value chain, from the research stage, to the primary sector and the market, in order to create a solid basis for the sustainable development of the sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it