MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W74293027

Graph Data Representation in Oracle Database 10 g : Case Studies in Life Sciences.

2004· article· en· W74293027 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Data(base) Engineering Bulletin · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOracleGraphBiological networkBiological dataBiological databaseGraph databaseRepresentation (politics)Data scienceTheoretical computer scienceDatabaseSoftware engineeringBioinformatics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New technologies have been developed in the life sciences that allow researchers to study biological systems in rich detail. These advances have resulted in an abundance of data that describes the relations between the fundamental components of biological systems, such as genes, proteins, and metabolites. The network of relations between the components holds insights as to how biological systems function, and consequently can help researchers understand the mechanisms behind disease. Biological networks are commonly managed and analyzed in a graph representation. Oracle Database 10g has the functionality to model data as a graph, and thereby has the potential to greatly facilitate research. In this paper we describe the Oracle implementation and provide case studies from the life sciences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.784

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it