Modelling the Problem of Production Scheduling for Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Companies are gradually moving towards reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMS) to achieve both changeable functionality of flexible manufacturing systems (FMS) and scalable capacity of dedicated manufacturing lines (DML) to the extent possible. Despite this expected trend in manufacturing, there is a dearth of literature on scheduling for RMS; papers in the production scheduling literature still mainly focus on either DML or FMS. This paper tackles the problem of scheduling production operations in RMS. After explicitly defining different aspects of the problem, a mathematical model is developed to formally model the problem. Using the model and commercial software of operations research, the small instances of the problem are solved for optimality. To effectively solve large instances of the problem, different simulated annealing metaheuristics are developed. Using numerical experiments, the model and simulated annealing algorithms are evaluated for performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it