MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W757970407

Robert Burley: The Disappearance of Darkness

2014· article· en· W757970407 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sten Rogerson

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative technology transfer and society · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhotography and Visual Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionPhotographyArt historyVisual artsShot (pellet)UncannyArtAesthetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RYERSON IMAGE CENTRE TORONTO JANUARY 22--APRIL 13, 2014 Robert Burley's exhibition The Disappearance of Darkness is an exquisite photographic confirmation of a dying technology. The series of work considers analog photography and the massive architecture that housed its production as coming to a close. And, with it, we say goodbye to an archetype of the industrial age. Shot on large-format 4 x 5 film and digitally printed, Burley's photographs are superb. Frayed carpets, abandoned cardigans of workers, and empty workspaces appear so close that one can imagine unraveling the carpet seam or slipping on the dingy sweater. The artist has an uncanny knack for making abject industrial spaces all too human. There is warmth that teeters on sympathy in these images. Burley not only records the disappearance of analog photography, but also chronicles his own relationship to the technology, creating a visceral and sensory experience. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] Burley travelled across Canada, the United States, and Europe, detailing the now empty spaces of analog photography's heyday. He takes on the challenge of documenting the empty halls of manufacturing facilities and offices, processing darkrooms and labs, and the end of monolithic factories dedicated to analog photography. Chalon-sur-Saone in France, known as the birthplace of photography in 1827, is where the Kodak-Pathe Plant operated for three-quarters of a century. Burley records the implosion with a mixture of distant observer and sensitive audience member. His images show various stages of demolition that capture the barren wasteland of industrialism and the grieving employees watching the flattening of their livelihood. His approach to this tension is repeatedly expressed in his pictures, showing great compassion for Kodak's lifetime employees while maintaining the keen eye of a documentary photographer. Implosions of Building 65 and 69, Kodak Park, Rochester, New York [2], shot in 2007, is a dusty, clouded image. Observers, passersby, and news reporters hang their heads to avoid inhalation. This image, without the context of title, could be misinterpreted as a site of war or terrorist attack. Its muddy dust fills the photograph with a sense of violence. Kodak's birthplace is transformed by Burley from the clean perimeters of Kodak Park into a spectacle of finality. Similarly pictured as either hollowed out and vacant or demolished spaces are Agfa Gevaert, established in Belgium in 1867; Ilford, located outside Manchester since 1879; Polaroid's factory in Massachusetts; Dwayne's photo lab in Kansas, the last lab to process Kodachrome; and Kodak Canada, situated at the end of Photography Drive in Toronto. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score0.555

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0960.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComparative technology transfer and societySame topicPhotography and Visual CultureFrench-language works237,207