MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W759574652

Reclaiming Klytemnestra: Revenge or Reconciliation

2004· article· en· W759574652 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe German Quarterly · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEastern European Communism and Reforms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMythologyArchetypeContext (archaeology)Character (mathematics)LiteratureCriticismOrder (exchange)HistoryPhilosophySociologyArt historyArtArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Komar, Kathleen L. Reclaiming Klytemnestra: Revenge or Reconciliation. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2003. 224pp. $34.95 hardcover. In Reclaiming Kathleen Komar examines late twentieth-century revisionist myth making associated with of House of Atreus, classical figure notoriously blamed and slain by her offspring in an act of violent matricide. Komar strives to unveil attempts to reinstate archetypes in literary and mythic landscape, thus making cultural change possible, and in so doing her study queries manner in which contemporary authors from Germany, Italy, Canada, and United States rethink why they are committed to doing so, and how they deal with violence enacted both upon and by women (2). Komar's study aligns itself with significant works of feminist criticism such as julia Kristeva's Hethique de l'amour (1977), Alicia Ostriker's Thieves of Language: Women Poetsand Revisionist Mythmaking (1985), and Judith Butler's Antigone's Claiin (2000). The main text is divided into four chapters and presents status of myth in historical context. In first chapter, Komar traces and compares various characteristics of the mythical Klytemnestra, given in classical texts by Homer, Stesichorus, Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides. This leads to her conclusion classical versions of myth highlight that a critical founding moment for Western culture hinges on subjugation of in service of a new patriarchal order (49-50). Turning her attention to Klytemnestra in pre- and early 1980s, Komar traces contemporary interpretations of mythical character in Martha Graham's ballet Clytemnestra, and in two novels, one by Christa Reinig (Entmannung), other Nancy Bogen's Who Stayed at Home. This chapter also includes close readings of Dacia Maraini's play I sogni di Clitennestra, and a monologue authored by Christine Bruckner entitled Bist du nun glucklich, toter Agamemnon? These texts suggest striking thematic similarities in they not only view marriage as limiting women's choices, but they also lament lack of women's control over their bodies. Some of more radical narratives highlight castration and other violent acts as inescapable, twentieth-century scenarios. Close readings of Christa Wolf's Kassandra, Marie Cardinal's Le fasse empiete, Severine Auffret's Nous, Cletemnestre, and an analysis of collaborative work by Judith Piper and Nancy Tuana entitled The Fabulous Furies reVue form basis of third chapter. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it