MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W777297691

Improving Scheduling in Heterogeneous Grid and Hadoop Systems

2013· dissertation· en· W777297691 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaImperial College London
KeywordsComputer scienceGridDistributed computingScheduling (production processes)Grid computingDatabaseParallel computingEngineeringOperations managementGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advances in network technologies and computing resources have led to the deployment of large scale computational systems, such as those following Grid or Cloud architectures. The scheduling problem is a significant issue in these distributed computing environments, where a scheduling algorithm should consider multiple objectives and performance metrics. Moreover, heterogeneity is increasing at both the application and resource levels. The heterogeneity in these systems can have a huge impact on performance in terms of metrics such as average completion time. However, traditional Grid and Cloud scheduling algorithms neglect heterogeneity in their scheduling decisions. This PhD dissertation studies the scheduling challenges in Computational Grid, Data Grid, and Cloud computing systems, and introduces new scheduling algorithms for each of these systems. The main issue in Grid scheduling is the wide distribution of resources. As a result, gathering full state information can add huge overhead to the scheduler. This thesis introduces a Computational Grid scheduling algorithm which simultaneously addresses minimizing completion times (by considering system heterogeneity), while requiring zero dynamic state information. Simulation results show the promising performance of this algorithm, and its robustness with respect to errors in parameter estimates. In the case of Data Grid schedulers, an efficient scheduling decision should select a combination of resources for a task that simultaneously mitigates the computation and the communication costs. Therefore, these schedulers need to consider a large search space to find an appropriate combination. This thesis introduces a new Data Grid scheduling algorithm, which dynamically makes replication and scheduling decisions. The proposed algorithm reduces the search space, decreases the required state information, and improves the performance by considering the system heterogeneity. Simulation results illustrate the promising performance of the introduced algorithm. Cloud computing can be considered as a next generation of Grid computing. One of the main challenges in Cloud systems is the enormous expansion of data in different applications. The MapReduce programming model and Hadoop framework were designed as a solution for executing large scale data-intensive applications. A large number of (heterogeneous) users, using the same Hadoop cluster, can result in tensions between the various performance metrics by which such systems are measured. This research introduces and implements a Hadoop scheduling system, which uses system information such as estimated job arrival rates and mean job execution times to make scheduling decisions. The proposed scheduling system, named COSHH (Classification and Optimization based Scheduler for Heterogeneous Hadoop systems), considers heterogeneity at both the application and cluster levels. The main objective of COSHH is to improve the average completion time of jobs. However, as it is concerned with other key Hadoop performance metrics, it also achieves competitive performance under minimum share satisfaction, fairness and locality metrics, with respect to other well-known Hadoop schedulers. The proposed scheduler can be efficiently applied in heterogeneous clusters, in contrast to most Hadoop schedulers, which assume homogeneous clusters. A Hadoop system can be described based on three factors: cluster, workload, and user. Each factor is either heterogeneous or homogeneous, which reflects the heterogeneity level of the Hadoop system. This PhD research studies the effect of heterogeneity in each of these factors on the performance of Hadoop schedulers. Three schedulers which consider different levels of Hadoop heterogeneity are used for the analysis: FIFO, Fair sharing, and COSHH. Performance issues are introduced for Hadoop schedulers, and experiments are provided to evaluate these issues. The reported results suggest guidelines for selecting an appropriate scheduler for different Hadoop systems. The focus of these guidelines is on systems which do not have significant fluctuations in the number of resources or jobs. There is a considerable challenge in Hadoop to schedule tasks and resources in a scalable manner. Moreover, the potential heterogeneous nature of deployed Hadoop systems tends to increase this challenge. This thesis analyzes the performance of widely used Hadoop schedulers including FIFO and Fair sharing and compares them with the COSHH scheduler. Based on the discussed insights, a hybrid solution is introduced, which selects appropriate scheduling algorithms for scalable and heterogeneous Hadoop systems with respect to the number of incoming jobs and available resources. The proposed hybrid scheduler considers the guidelines provided for heterogeneous Hadoop systems in the case that the number of jobs and resources change considerably. To improve the performance of high priority users, Hadoop guarantees minimum numbers of resource shares for these users at each point in time. This research compares different scheduling algorithms based on minimum share consideration and under different heterogeneous and homogeneous environments. For this evaluation, a real Hadoop system is developed and evaluated using Facebook workloads. Based on the experiments performed, a reliable scheduling algorithm is suggested which can work efficiently in different environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it