MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Early Intervention Training in Ukraine: Building Capacity One Step at a Time

2007· article· en· W821468254 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueASHA Leader · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntervention (counseling)Training (meteorology)Capacity buildingPsychologyPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationBusinessMedicineNursingGeographyEconomicsEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

You have accessThe ASHA LeaderWorld Beat1 Aug 2007Early Intervention Training in Ukraine: Building Capacity One Step at a Time Laura M. Justice Laura M. Justice Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.WB6.12102007.30 SectionsAbout ToolsAdd to favorites ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Having recently returned from a five-day journey to Ukraine to train Ukrainian speech-language pathologists, I realized one concept that stood out clearly: While we do not speak the same language or share the same culture, our shared profession of speech-language pathology—and what it says about us as individuals—makes us far more alike than we are different. This trip was the second of two organized through the nonprofit Ukraine Special Needs Orphanages Fund, Inc. (USNOF) to enhance the skills of SLPs and parents of children with disabilities receiving services through an early intervention center. Education and Treatment Currently, Ukraine is adopting a variety of laws to improve the quality of life for persons with disabilities. Historically, during the Soviet era, persons with disabilities in Ukraine had few—if any—rights and were typically hidden away in their families’ homes or in institutions. With encouragement from international organizations—including the United Nations Children’s Fund and the World Health Organization—to improve the rights of persons with disabilities, the Ukrainian government is attempting to improve early intervention, schooling, and community participation for children with disabilities. These efforts, however, are only in their infancy. For instance, only in 2002 did the government earmark dollars to provide social assistance to families caring for children with disabilities in their homes, yet the amounts available are substantially less than what is needed for appropriate care (about $60/month). In addition, only 3% of families have access to these funds (UNICEF, 2002). Experts also contend that coordination is inadequate among newly established agencies providing medical, social, and psychological services to these families, and families have limited access to quality early intervention programs and elementary schools that meet the needs of children with disabilities (UNICEF, 2002). Thus, many children with disabilities are institutionalized in orphanages (typically abandoned as newborns) or attend full-time residential special education schools, with very poor long-term prospects. Early Intervention Historically, the country’s health and education infrastructure has not offered treatment or educational opportunities for children with disabilities and their families. The country also lacks institutional supports enabling parents to raise children with disabilities in their natural home environment. The trend toward institutionalization in orphanages, however, is beginning to change: understanding is growing in Ukraine of both disability rights and the economic costs of failing to support educational access for all its citizens. In light of such trends, early intervention centers are emerging across Ukraine to improve the skills and competencies of children from birth to 5 years of age and to help families raise their children within the natural home environment. One such center—Pahinets—is located in the Rivne Oblast (province) in western Ukraine. It was established in January 2004 in a kindergarten building to provide educational and therapeutic services to children with disabilities in nearby towns and villages. Pahinets features active collaborations with a local parent group as well as a local university. Its SLPs provide individual and small-group treatment to young children with a range of disabilities—from relatively minor to more profound—and to children who live in a nearby orphanage. The only early intervention center in the province, it serves as the model for a similar center being established in the neighboring Lviv oblast. Visiting Ukraine In 2005, as part of a USNOF team that included an autism specialist and two physical therapists, I visited Pahinets to conduct a “needs assessment” related to early communication intervention. I met with speech-language clinicians, nursing students, parents, university leaders, and program administrators at the center to identify resources needed to meet the needs of children attending the center. The need for three types of information emerged—general methods for delivering speech-language services, specific treatments for children with disabilities such as autism and cerebral palsy, and what inclusive services might look like in elementary schools. Working closely with USNOF leadership, my University of Virginia colleague Alice Wiggins and I helped organize two five-day training workshops for Pahinets SLPs and parents. Local psychologists and other specialists also participated. In June 2006, workshop sessions focused on general communication development, augmentative and alternative communication sessions, and advocacy for families. Most recently, in June 2007, an educational team comprising nine individuals conducted an intensive five-day workshop at Pahinets. I was joined by three other SLPs: Anita McGinty (University of Virginia), Deborah Arin (EBS Healthcare), and Jackie van Lankveld (Speech Services Niagara). Five educators rounded out our team: Alice Wiggins and Amy Sofka (University of Virginia), Diane Browder and Katherine Trela (University of North Carolina-Charlotte), and Dianne Koontz Lowman (James Madison University). Training workshops were offered simultaneously to SLPs and parents of Pahinets children, addressing topics such as treatment techniques for children with autism, treatment of early feeding difficulties, and early communication facilitation. Team members also met individually with parents to offer expert guidance on their children’s specific situations. Financial support for the training was provided by the Oak Foundation, EBS Healthcare, the Organization for Medical and Psychological Assistance for Children Overseas (OMPACO), the Ontario Rotary Clubs, and the University of Virginia Preschool Language and Literacy Research Lab. The SLPs of Ukraine require the support of their North American counterparts, and we must honor in every way that we can assist their “front-line” role in promoting the quality of life for children with disabilities and their families. During each of my three trips to Ukraine in the last five years, I have had startling insights when talking with SLPs of how much unites us in our vigilant concern for the health and well-being of children, our proactive stance toward families, and our deep interest in communication as the most basic and important of all human capacities. Ukraine: A Country in Crisis Ukraine is one of the most economically challenged countries in Eastern Europe, “caught in the transition from a former Soviet country” to a modern democracy (United Nations Children’s Fund [UNICEF], 2007). Ukraine is most known for the 1986 Chernobyl disaster that affected more than 6 million people and the 2004 “Orange Revolution” that overturned the results of a rigged national election. Located at the crossroads of western and eastern Europe, Ukraine’s location and sizeСas the second largest country in EuropeСhave made it a target for countries competing for European domination. The Soviet conquest of Ukraine in the 1920s resulted in the death of more than 8 million citizens, and battles during World War II resulted in an additional 8 million deaths. Following independence in 1991, Ukraine has experienced a demographic crisis. This young country faces serious threats; the annual mortality rate (16 per 1,000) is nearly twice the annual birth rate (8.6 per 1,000). As a report of the United Nations Population Fund noted, health crises, social problems, and economic challenges have contributed to the crisis. Ukraine’s citizens face several additional threats: The fastest-growing rate of HIV infection in all of Eastern Europe High infant mortality rates Epidemic rates for many types of congenital anomalies, including neural tube defects four times the normal range in Northwestern Ukraine (where Chernobyl fallout was greatest; Yuskiv et al., 2004), and for communicable diseases including tuberculosis, parasites, and syphilis (UNICEF, 2006) Sharp increases during the 1990s (following Chernobyl) of childhood thyroid cancers, other neoplasms, and diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs Increased institutionalization and abandonment of children over the last two decades, due in large part to family poverty, family breakdowns, and young age of child-bearing mothers (UNICEF, 2005) References United Nations Children’s Fund (2002). Children and disability in Ukraine. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. Google Scholar United Nations Children’s Fund (2005). Child protection. Retrieved July 10, 2007, from: http://www.unicef.org/ukraine/activities_4943.html. Google Scholar United Nations Children’s Fund (2006). Children and young people living or working on the streets: The missing face of the HIV epidemic in Ukraine. Kiev, Ukraine. Google Scholar United Nations Children’s Fund (2007). Ukraine fights rising HIV/AIDS infection rates. Retrieved July 10, 2007, from: http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/ukraine_fights_aids.html. Google Scholar United Nations Population Fund (2007). UNFPA CO In Ukraine. Retrieved July 14, 2007, from:http://www.unfpa.org.ua/ukr/viewpage.php?page_id=18&localeset=en. Google Scholar World Health Organization (2000). Highlights on health in Ukraine. Retrieved July 12, 2007, from:http://www.euro.who.int/document/e72372.pdf [PDF]. Google Scholar Yuskiv N., Andelin C., Polischuk S., Shevchuk O., Sosynyuk Z., Vihovska T., Yevtushok L., Oakley G., & Wertelecki W. (2004). High rates of neural tube defects in Ukraine.Birth Defects Research, 70, 400–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Author Notes Laura M. Justice, formerly of the University of Virginia, is professor in the School of Teaching and Learning at The Ohio State University. She can be contacted at [email protected]. Advertising Disclaimer | Advertise With Us Advertising Disclaimer | Advertise With Us Additional Resources FiguresSourcesRelatedDetails Volume 12Issue 10August 2007 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in print: Aug 1, 2007 Metrics Downloaded 279 times Topicsasha-topicsleader_do_tagleader-topicsasha-article-typesCopyright & Permissions© 2007 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it