MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W83367350 · doi:10.5006/c2004-04762

Is Souring and Corrosion by Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria in Oil Fields Reduced More Efficiently by Nitrate or by Nitrite?

2004· article· en· W83367350 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicBuilding materials and conservation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulfate-reducing bacteriaNitrateNitriteCorrosionSulfateOil fieldEnvironmental chemistryChemistryMetallurgyInorganic chemistryWaste managementMaterials sciencePetroleum engineeringGeologyEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Successful application of both nitrate and nitrite to combat souring in oil fields has been reported. The effect of these treatments on corrosion is not well documented. Using up-flow, packed-bed bioreactors simulating an oil field we have found that both nitrate and nitrite are effective sulfide removers. The required dose depended on the concentration of oil organics used as the energy source by the microbial community. Because of its higher oxidative power, nitrate can remove more oxidizable oil organics than nitrite. However, nitrite is a strong SRB inhibitor. Nitrate gives less SRB inhibition, because it is only partially converted to nitrite. Because iron corrosion is either not affected or increased by the presence of nitrate, but strongly inhibited by nitrite under our experimental conditions we conclude that use of nitrite is on balance more favorable than use of nitrate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBuilding materials and conservationFrench-language works237,207