MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W84389294

Choosing grid points in solving singular optimal control problems by iterative dynamic programming

2007· article· en· W84389294 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptimal controlInterval (graph theory)Dynamic programmingMathematical optimizationGridControl theory (sociology)Convergence (economics)Parametrization (atmospheric modeling)MathematicsOptimization problemComputer scienceControl (management)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In using iterative dynamic programming to determine the optimal control policy of complex systems, the time interval is divided into P time intervals to convert the optimal control problem into an optimization problem involving P stages. We consider the parametrization, where in each time interval the control is kept constant, but the length of the time stage is allowed to vary, so that the length of each time stage is determined during the course of optimization. To determine the optimal feed rate for two fed-batch reactor models involving ethanol fermentation, it is found that more than one grid point is required at each time interval to get convergence to the vicinity of the global optimum. For these optimal control problems, it is considerably better to use random perturbations in the control policy than uniform perturbations in order to generate the grid points.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it